Within days, Elizabeth fell victim to a persistent high
fever. She suffered severe stomach distress at the same time. Her new Treasurer,
Baron Burghley, wrote to Sir Francis Walsingham, then special ambassador to the
French Court in the matter of the marriage.
He (the messenger going to Paris) can also tell you of a
sudden alarm specially yesternight, by her Majestie being suddenly sick in her
stomach, and as suddenly relieved by a vomit.
“A vomit” is vague enough that her condition at that point cannot be certainly known.
Undoubtedly, the descriptions do not do justice to the severity as matters were considered dire enough that preparations were made for the worst.
The Queen has been very ill and the malady proved to be
small-pox. Before the eruption declared itself, the earl of Leicester, the
Treasurer, and the Earl of Bedford were closteted together several times to
arrange in case the Queen died, to proclaim as King one of the two sons of the
earl of Hertford by Lady Catherine . . ."[3]
At some point she broke out in what her doctors declared was
the smallpox and the source of the mysterious illness was considered known. Throughout,
her beloved Earl of Leicester stayed beside her bed almost continuously.
The Queen herself was not entirely convinced, by the account
of her newly appointed First Secretary, Sir Thomas Smith.[5]
On Thursday night last, Monsieur de Crocque was there
(Windsor) and had audience given him by the Lord Treasurer, my Lord
Chamberlain, and my Lord of Leicester, because the Queen's Majesty was not at
that time perfectly whole of the small pox, as the Physicians say, although her
Majesty and a great sort more, will not have it so, now it makes no matter what
it was, thanks be to God she is perfectly whole, and no sign thereof left in
her face…[6]
Nevertheless, she and Smith were highly pleased that no scars were left on her face from the ordeal.
We learn more about her own personal perspective in a letter
she wrote in order to comfort her old ally the Earl of Shrewsbury.
... we perceave that you had hard of som late siknes
wherewith we weare visited; . . . True it is that we were about XIII dayes
paste distempered as commonly happenith in the begynning of a fever; but after
twoo or three daies, without any great inward siknes, ther began to appere
certain red spotts in som parte of our face, likely to proove the small pox;
but, thanked be God, contrary to the expectation of our phisycians, & all
others about us, the same so vanished awaye as within foure or fyve dayes passed
no token almost appeered; and at this day, we thank God, we are so free from
any token or marke of any suche disease that none can conjecture any suche
thing. So as by this you may perceave what war our siknes, and in what good
estate we be; ...[7]
By the time of this letter, Elizabeth seems satisfied
that she has had a bout of smallpox. But it is another dispatch by Fenelon to
Paris that makes clear just how uncertain she and her advisors had been.
Elizabeth tells Fenelon that the last time he was at Windsor,
she was unable to see him "because she had a bad stomach owing to her having taken a
little mithridate."[8]
Mithridatium is a mythical universal antidote against all
poisons of every sort. It is not a emetic, however, in any of the forms commonly described. We do not know how much the Queen vomited and it was
unlikely related to the Mithridatium.
While none of the principals were likely to understand that,
having supposedly already had smallpox in September of 1561, modern medical
science assures us that she had to be immune from the disease for the rest of her life, some clearly had reasons to
doubt that rash was smallpox. Some of the reasons can be perceived through all
of these diverse accounts.
If it was smallpox, though, as was finally settled upon, how
could Queen Elizabeth have had it twice?
[1]
Nichols, John. Progresses, Public Processions, &c. of Queen Elizabeth
(1823). 321.
[2] Chamberlin, Frederick. Private Character of Queen Elizabeth (1922), 64. Burghley to Walsingham. October 20, 1572.
[3]
Ibid., Unsigned letter of intelligence from London to Duke of Alba, October 26, 1572.
[4] Ibid., 64. Fenelon to Paris. October 1572.
[5]
Nichols, 307. “Julie 13, the Queenes Majestie, at Whitehall, made Sir William
Cecil Lord of Burghleie, Lord High Treasurer of England ; Lord William Howard,
late Lord Chamberleine, Lord Privie Seale ; the Earle of Sussex, Lord
Chamberleine; Sir Thomas Smith, Principall Secretarie; and Christopher Hatton,
Esquier, Capteine of the Guard.”
[6]
Chamberlin, 64. Sir Thomas Smith to Sir Francis Walsingham, October 13, 1572.
[7]
Ibid., 64-5. Citing Elizabeth to Earl of Shrewsbury, Lodge's IIIustrations
of British history, vol. ii. p. 79.
[8]
Ibid., 65. Fenelon to Paris. October 27, 1572.
No comments:
Post a Comment