Saturday, August 06, 2022

Queen Elizabeth I Truly Loved a Good Play.

More even than her father, Henry VIII, Queen Elizabeth loved court revels. During the earlier Tudor years, northern Italy was blossoming as the center of Renaissance drama. Henry had Italian musicians, dancers and actors at his court. Presumably some were acrobats, as well.

Edward and Mary seem to have stuck more with the old pattern of holding revels around Christmas and the visits of overseas dignitaries. Edward’s surviving accounts refer to banquets and maskings. Mary’s Master of the Revels, Thomas Cawarden, gave considerable attention to maintaining the Queen’s wardrobe and her gardens at Nonesuch. She did have regular banquets.

Elizabeth’s courtiers were returning from their embassies to Venice, and its neighboring Italian states, having studied the secular theater there. It is with her reign, and the advent of the printing press, that England would join that Renaissance world.

It is Elizabeth, then, who condescended to attend the play The Tragidie of Ferrex and Porrex at the Inner Temple Hall on “xviij. day of lanuarie. 1561.” Condescended even more than usual as the play was written and performed in English rather than the customary Latin.

To that date, almost all plays performed before the monarch at universities were written and performed in Latin. Elizabeth was fluent in the language and patiently watched dozens of such university plays during the annual summer progresses of her long reign.

This would be the first English play her court would attend at the nearby Inns of Court (a law school) in London. History would remember it even more for being the first English play written in unrhymed iambic pentameter “blank verse”.

The Inns of Court were filled with young sons from noble and wealthy merchant families. They served as finishing schools as much as law schools. Their extra-curricular activities were almost as much a part of the life at court as activities immediately around the Queen herself. So was their competition to please potential patrons within the higher circles of court power.

The Queen, for her part, was surely looking forward to an entertaining evening watching a play. She no more than anyone could have known that history was in progress of being made. No one could know that blank verse was soon to become the language of the English stage for centuries to come.

But, when in her own court, she expected to see her plays performed in English. And she probably enjoyed, as much as any, the bloom of secular theater made possible by her young intellectuals’ fascination with vernacular Renaissance drama and novels.

What she may have suspected from the evening’s entertainment, like any other, however, was that the play would include encouragement to marry and produce an heir. The subject was kept before her day and night. A great many literary works, dedicated to her in English and Latin, slipped in the subject of providing an heir to the throne. She could barely leave her private chambers without running a gauntlet of “off-hand” observations relating to the subject in one way or another.

So then, it seems unlikely that she was shocked to hear the Argument of the play start matters off in a fashion to which she had grown accustomed after 2 years.

And afterwards for want of issue of the prince whereby the succession of the crown became uncertain, they fell to civill warre, in which both they and many of their issues were slaine, and the land for a long time almost desolate and miserably wasted.

Her subjects were afraid of yet another ruinous civil war. And, besides, it was a woman’s place to have children. Especially if the women were Queen’s.

But Elizabeth had said that it was enough that she was married to her kingdom. In the language of the time, this was a dangerous “fancie” on the part of a Queen:

                                             …so is wont to be.

When lords, and trusted rulers under kings,

To please the present fancie of the prince,

With wrong transpose the course of governance.

Murders, mischief, or civill sword at length,;

Or mutuall treason, or a just revenge,

When right succeding line returns again,

By loves just judgement and deserved wrath,

Brings them to cruell and reprochfull death.

And roots their names and kindreds from the earth.

The line could only be meant for her as none of the king or the princes in the play shares the fancy in the least. They all are pleased to have provided a succession to the kingdom.

King Gorbodoc makes precisely that point.

Gorb…. That when by death my life and rule shall cease.

The kingdom yet may with unbroken course,

Have certain prince, by whose undoubted right,

Your wealth and peace may stand in quiet stay,

And eke that they whom nature hath prepared,

In time to take my place in princely seat,

And a fine example he is for a Queen who is already past prime marriageable age at 28 years. Before anyone knew it, King Gorbodoc’s lesson could all go for naught.

In the great tragic turn of the play, in fact, Gorbodoc and both of his sons die in violent, rapid succession. Without being too open to the accusation of chastising their Queen, the playwrights are now in a position to float a few other suggestions for her Royal consideration.

No, no: then Parliament should have been holden,

And certain heirs appointed to the crown,

To stay the title of established right,

And in the people plant obedience,

While yet the prince did Hue, whose name and power

By lawfull summons and authoritie

Might make a Parliament to be of force,

And might have set the state in quiet stay.

But now O happie man, whom speedie death

Deprives of life, ne is enforced to see

These hugie mischiefs and these miseries,

These civil warres, these murders & these wrongs.

Of justice, yet must God in fine restore

This noble crown unto the lawfull heir:

For right will always Hue, and rise at length,

But wrong can never take deep root to last.

Elizabeth’s counselors had already been pressing persistently for her to allow parliament to establish a successor until she could put an end to the nation’s fears by virtue of a biological child.

On that historical January day, the play The Tragidie of Ferrex and Porrex would not only begin to establish blank verse as the language of English plays but it would equally establish court plays as a medium for suggesting to Elizabeth directions to take in her government of the court and the realm. Suggestions that otherwise would have been considered impertinent or worse. The Queen truly loved a good play.


Also at Virtual Grub Street:


  • Mary, Queen of Scots, signs papers abdicating her throne: July 24, 1567. July 23, 2022. ‘a “casket,” left behind by Bothwell as he fled, was discovered filled with incendiary personal papers.’
  • Livin’ Real at Windsor Castle with Queen Elizabeth. June 4, 2022. “Being fans of the Queen and the times, we watch television miniseries and movies draped with intrigue, lust and tapestries.”
  • The Plans to Abduct the Princess Mary. April 2, 2022. “Yesterday arrived the person sent by M. du Rosulx to investigate the means for the enterprise, and to inform me of what he proposed to do for his part.”
  • Queen Elizabeth’s Jealousy could be frightening to mere mortals. February 6, 2022. “I adventured to say, as far as discretion did go, in defence of our friende; and did urge muche in behalfe of youthe and enticinge love,…”
  • To Where Did Queen Elizabeth I Disappear in August 1564? July 18, 2021. “Leicestershire was in the opposite direction from London. Nichols could discover no more.”
  • Check out the English Renaissance Article Index for many more articles and reviews about this fascinating time and about the Shakespeare Authorship Question.
  • Check out the Medieval and Tudor Holy Days Page for many other articles.

  • No comments: