The Tudor nobility were great card players. Playing cards had been introduced to the kingdom in the mid-15th century, by all appearances. We learn from Strutt that
The privy purse expenses of Henry VII. show his losses at cards on several occasions.1
While rare examples of the cards themselves survive, the rules by which they were played were only hinted at. Edmond Hoyle would not publish his famous rules for another century and a half.
When the sixteenth century is reached the references to card-playing in England, and the proofs that it was popular among all classes, are most abundant. Losses at cards occur in Henry VIII. privy purse expenses; whilst those of his daughter Mary, afterwards Queen, from 1536 to 1544, show that card-playing was her constant habit.
As for commoners, they were forbidden dicing and card-playing except during Christmas.
A statute of 1541 forbids card-playing by the working-classes.2
Not that all obeyed.
Whole chapters could be filled with the notices of cardplaying that occur in the poems and plays of this century. One must suffice. In the comedy of Gammer Gurtons Needle, first printed in 1551, old Dame Chat thus invites two of her friends to a game of cards :—
What, Diccon ? Come nere, ye be no stranger,
We be fast set a trump, man, hard by the fire ;
Thou shalt set on the king, if thou come a little nyer.
Come hither, Dol; Dol, sit down and play this game,
And as thou sawest me do, see thou do even the same,
There is five trumps besides the queen, the hindmost thou shalt find her,
Take hede of Gim Glover's wife, she hath an eye behind her.
The kingdom's need for archers was the first motive for laws forbidding other types of gaming than archery competitions. The need for able-bodied infantry allowed for wrestling matches.
With the rise of the influence of the spoil-sport Puritans, the focus turned to the evil effects of most other means of having fun. Claims of pagan origins (in this instance, the Tarot) were highlighted.
Minister Northbrooke was most strenuous in his condemnation of cardplaying in Elizabeth's reign, stating that— "The plaie at Cardes is an invention of the devill, which he founde out, that he might the easilier bring in idolatrie amongest men: For the Kings and Coate cardes that we use nowe were in olde time the images of idols and false Gods, which since they that woulde seeme Christians have chaunged into Charlemaine, Launcelot, Hector, and suchlike names, because they would not seeme to imitate their idolatrie therein, and yet mainteine the plaie itselfe, the verie invention of Saban the Devill and woulde so disguise this mischiefe under the cloak of suche gaie names."
The knaves of that date, in English and French packs, were usually known as Lancelot, Hogier, Rolant, and Valery; the kings bore the names of David, Alexander, Caesar, and Charlemagne ; and the queens, Rachael, Argine, Pallas, and Judith.3
As the quote from Gammer Gurton informs us, any given group of players might have its own names for the face-cards.
So then, we know far more about the evil effects of card-playing on the Christian soul than we do about the rules of the games during the 16th century.
Primero and Maw.—Queen Elizabeth was fond of taking a hand at Primero which was then the fashionable game of cards. The favourite game of James I. was Maw which took the place of Primero during his reign ; it afterwards became popular under the name of Five Cards.4
A page called “Primero: A Renaissance Cardgame” seems to have had some success in giving us the rules of the most popular card game of the century, Primero.
Four cards are dealt, face down, to each player in the standard manner.... Starting with the player to the dealer's left, each player has three options: bid, stake, or pass.... Staking, or "covering" a previous bid involves putting money down. No other action is necessary or required.5
My limited reading in the primary sources confirm both the description and the fact that 16th century Europeans were constitutionally unable to simply state a set of rules without cloaking them in all the mystery of an alchemical text.
Shamelessly having endangered the reader's mortal soul, I further quote Northbrooke, from Taylor's History of Playing Cards, in hopes of overcoming the effect:
John Northbrooke, in his Treatise against Dicing, Dauncing, &c., published about 1577, writes thus: “ And therefore to conclude, I say with that good father, St. Cyprian, the playe at cardes is an invention of the deuill, which he found out that he might the easier bring in ydolatrie amongst men. For the kings and coate cardes that we vse nowe were in old times the images of idols and false gods, which they that would seeme Christians, have changed into Charlemaine, Launcelot, Hector, and such lyke names, bicause they would not seeme to imitate their idolatrie therein, and yet maintaine the playe itselfe the very inuention of Satan, the deuill, and woulde so disguise the mischeife vnder the cloake of such gaye names.”6
Still, having balanced my accounts somewhat, I cannot resist the temptation to quote once more from Taylor on the sinful side of the ledger where we learn that King James's
favourite game appears to have been Maw, which is alluded to in a passage quoted by Mr. Chatto, from a satirical pamphlet of this reign, called Tom Tell-troath, and re-printed in the Harleian Miscellany; “They say you have lost the fairest game at Maw that ever king had, for want of making the best advantage of the five-finger, and playing the other helps in time. That your owne card-holders play bootie, and give the signe out of your owne hand, that hee you played withal hath ever been knowne for the greatest cheater in Christendome....”
Even without knowing the rules, the picture is wholly recognizable. It seems that card-playing is, indeed, a temptation too powerful to resist.
1 Strutt, Joseph. Sports and Pastimes of the People of England (1801). 260-1.
2 Ibid.
3Ibid.
4Ibid.
5Suzuki, Jeff. “Primero: A Renaissance Cardgame” https://math.bu.edu/INDIVIDUAL/jeffs/primero.html
6Taylor, Edward S. The History of Playing Cards (1865). 143-4.
Also at Virtual Grub Street:
Invention in a Noted Weed: the Poetry of William Shakespeare. September 21, 2024. “The coward conquest of a wretches knife,...”
The Sonnets of Shakespeare: Sonnet 108. Edward de Vere to his son, Henry. “That may expresse my love, or thy deare merit?”
- Sonnet 130: Shakespeare's Reply to a 1580 Poem by Thomas Watson. September 7, 2024. “Interesting to see our Derek Hunter debating with Dennis McCarthy, at the North group,...”.
- Rocco Bonetti's Blackfriars Fencing School and Lord Hunsdon's Water Pipe. August 12, 2023. “... the tenement late in the tenure of John Lyllie gentleman & nowe in the tenure of the said Rocho Bonetti...”
Check out the Shakespeare Authorship Article Index for many more articles and reviews about this fascinating time and about the Shakespeare Authorship Question.
- Check out the Letters Index: Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford for many letters from this fascinating time, some related to the Shakespeare Authorship Question.